Skip to main content

Ron Harper Explains Key Difference Between Michael Jordan And Kobe Bryant

Ron Harper is one of the few players who got to be teammates with both Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant. And in a recent interview with Stacey King, Harper explained the difference between both players, and why he believes Jordan was a cut above Bryant, and the rest of the NBA.

“He’s probably as close as anyone else to ever gonna be competing with MJ. He was a very competitive competitor. He patterned his game, walked and talked like MJ, and be like MJ. And them two became special close at the end of my career. When you watch MJ, you see him, it’s the same thing.”

“What I tell people separates Kobe from MJ, MJ was about 230 pounds, and Kobe was about 210. And you know, the physicality that MJ played with on the offensive and defensive end will wear him down. But as far as athletic-wise, the same fadeaway, the jump shot, the midrange game, Kobe had all of that and will compete until the end of the day… like MJ.”



It is no secret that Kobe Bryant modeled his game and his style of play, not to mention his approach to the game and his mentality after Michael Jordan. Kobe spoke on numerous occasions about Jordan being his role model, and later, his mentor, and how much of an influence Jordan had on his career.

Harper’s comments seem to echo what is the prevailing thought on Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant. Many believe Kobe to be a ‘lite’ version of Michael Jordan, someone who had almost all the same mannerisms and stylistic qualities as Jordan but not quite the exact level of skill and strength.

That isn’t to denigrate Kobe Bryant, as being a ‘lite’ version of arguably the greatest player of all time will give you a great career, as Bryant was able to experience for himself in his 20-year NBA stint.



Ron Harper On 1996 Bulls vs 2016 Warriors

Ron Harper was also asked about the 1996 Chicago Bulls, who won 72 games in a season en route to winning the NBA championship, and how they would fair against the 2016 Golden State Warriors, who broke their wins record. He noted that while the Warriors were good, the Bulls actually won a championship in their best season, and proclaimed that they would easily beat the 2016 Warriors in a seven-game series.

“73-9 sounds good. But 72-10 has a ring to it… It doesn’t mean a thing without that ring. You can’t be the greatest without that team… Who’s Stephen Curry gonna dunk on? If you’re talking about our rules, it’s too physical… We could adapt to any style of basketball they want to play.”



Of course, these kinds of arguments can never happen devoid of context. Harper believes that regardless of the rules and timing of the series, the Bulls would be able to adapt and cause problems for the Warriors.

But while he patronizingly acknowledged the strengths of the Warriors, Harper should know that hypothetically, the Warriors have a weapon to dismantle the 96′ Bulls – Steve Kerr.

Kerr, who was on the Bulls in that season, went on to become the coach of the Golden State Warriors later in his career and led them to their 73-9 record. So he will know how to account for players like Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen on the court.

Who would win in a seven-game series between the 1996 Bulls and the 2016 Warriors? We will probably never have the answer to that, but fans will forever enjoy partaking in the debate and speculation about this dream match.